ABSTRACT
Introduction Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare, but severe side effect after vaccination with adenovirus vector-based vaccines (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, AstraZeneca and Ad26.COV2.S, Johnson & Johnson/ Janssen) in which platelet activating anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies cause thrombocytopenia and thrombosis at unusual sites. Patients and treating physicians are concerned about whether other vaccinations can also trigger thrombosis in patients with a history of VITT. We showed that VITT patients can safely receive their second and third vaccination against Covid-19 with an mRNA-based vaccine. [1] However, there is limited information on whether other vaccines than against Covid-19 could booster platelet activating anti-PF4 antibodies. Uncertainty increased after a report of VITT caused by human papilloma vaccination. [2] Method In our follow-up study of patients with laboratory confirmed VITT (EUPAS45098), an anti-PF4/heparin IgG enzyme immune assay (EIA) and a PF4-dependent platelet activation assay (PIPA) were performed at regular intervals and after each vaccination reported to us. Results Seventy-one VITT patients (43 female, median age at VITT diagnosis 48, range 18-80) were followed for a median of 56 weeks (range: 13-77 weeks). During the follow-up period, eight vaccinations other than against Covid-19 were reported: Six vaccinations against influenza (three Influvac, two Vaxigrip Tetra, one Influsplit Tetra) and two consecutive vaccinations against tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) in one patient. In six patients who received vaccination against influenza, all patients showed decreasing or stable EIA optical density (OD) levels. None of them showed a reactivation of platelet-activating anti- PF4-antibodies in the PIPA. The patient who was vaccinated against TBE twice showed stable EIA OD levels and remained negative in the PIPA throughout. No new thrombosis or recurrent thrombocytopenia were observed after any vac- cination. Five out of six patients still received therapeutic anticoagulation, one patient did not receive any anticoagulative drug (Fig. 1). Conclusion Similar to observations after consecutive mRNA-vaccinations against Covid-19 in VITT patients, vaccinations against influenza and TBE very unlikely reactivate platelet-activating anti-PF4-antibodies. Further follow up of the VITT patient cohort is performed to detect any new safety signal related to recurrence of VITT. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
Introduction Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare, but severe side effect after Covid-19 and other vaccinations. First cases of VITT-mimicking antibodies in unvaccinated patients with recurrent thrombosis have been described. Differentiation between heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and VITT is difficult in some patients. Widely used enzyme-linked immunoassays (EIA) cannot differentiate between the two, some of them even fail to detect VITT antibodies. So far, differentiation between HIT-like and VITT-like anti-PF4 antibodies can only be performed in specialized laboratories by functional tests using the heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) or PF4-induced platelet activation (PIPA) test. We have developed an assay, which can distinguish between HIT and VITT antibodies and can be used in any hospital laboratory. Method Confirming platelet-activation assays (HIPA and PIPA) were performed as described.[1] We defined 3 cohorts: 1) Negative controls (n = 112, including 35 healthy donors from before 2020, 46 clinical patients suspected for HIT but with negative EIA and HIPA and 31 non-thrombotic patients);2) classical HIT-patients with positive EIA and HIPA (n = 121);3) typical VITT patients (n = 63;presenting after vaccination with adenoviral vector-based Covid-19 vaccine and positive EIA and PIPA). Samples were analyzed by an automated coagulation analyzer ACL AcuStar (Werfen / IL Inc., Bedford, MA, USA) using HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) and a prototype of VITT-IgG(PF4) assay according to the manufacturer's protocol. For both assays, raw data was analyzed as relative light units (RLU). Results All VITT samples were positive in the prototype VITT-assay (Fig. 1);only a few (n = 9;14.3 %) also showed weakly positive results in the HIT-assay. On the other hand, most of the HIT samples showed positive results in the HIT-assay (113;93.4 %), 34 of them (30.1 %) also reacted positive in the prototype VITT-assay (12 of them strongly;10.6 %), and three demonstrated an antibody pattern like autoimmune VITT. Negative control samples where all non-reactive in the HITassay and served to adjust the cutoff for the prototype VITT-assay. Conclusion The different reaction pattern of samples of HIT and VITT patients using HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) and a VITT prototype assay was able to distinguish between the two antibody entities for the first time. The combination of assays can facilitate a rapid decision whether heparin may be used for treatment and also identify patients with autoimmune-VITT as a cause of recurrent thrombosis. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
In this review, we summarise the current knowledge on vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) and new insights into its underlying pathogenesis. VITT is characterised by severe thromboses occurring 5-20 days after vaccination with an adenoviral vector-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (AstraZeneca or Johnson & Johnson). Thromboses typically involve the cerebral sinus and venous system. Routine laboratory analyses show thrombocytopenia and high D-dimer levels. The pathogenesis is based on immunological processes similar to those in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Accordingly, VITT is associated with high-titre immunoglobulin G directed against platelet factor 4 (PF4). Interaction with adenoviral vector-based vaccines leads to modifications of PF4 allowing antibody-producing cells to identify PF4. Anti-PF4 antibodies activate platelets through FcgammaIIa receptors. The detection of platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies confirms the diagnosis of VITT. Treatment is based on anticoagulation, which inhibits thrombin itself or thrombin formation, and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin G, which inhibits cell activation via FcgammaIIa receptors. In severe cases, plasma exchange could also be an option. In some patients, a pre-VITT syndrome precedes VITT. Pre-VITT patients typically present with severe headache before thromboses are manifest. The early identification of a pre-VITT syndrome allows for the prevention of thrombotic complications. The specific dynamics of the immune reaction in VITT correspond to a transient, secondary immune response. Current studies address how PF4 binds to different adenoviral proteins and investigate the functional role of other vaccine components. Some of these factors contribute to the induction of a pro-inflammatory danger signal that triggers the first stage of VITT pathogenesis. In the second stage, high-titre anti-PF4 antibodies activate platelets and granulocytes. In a process called NETosis (neutrophil extracellular traps), activated granulocytes release DNA. Anti-PF4 antibodies then bind to complexes of PF4 and DNA. This enhances further cell activation via Fcgamma receptors and consequently also the formation of thrombin. At the end of the article, we comment on how the current knowledge on VITT may influence global vaccination campaigns against SARS-CoV-2 and we address how anti-PF4 antibodies may be involved in recurrent arterial and venous thromboses not associated with VITT and HIT. Copyright © 2022 Georg Thieme Verlag. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: In Germany, 68 patients with laboratory-confirmed vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) are enrolled in a follow-up study of their anti-PF4- antibody response. During contact to the respective patients, it became evident, that beside a great variability of physical sequelae some of them also suffer from psychological distress. Aim(s): We offered psychological support to patients who suffer from mental stress due to their experiences in connection with VITT. A particular challenge was that the patients are located throughout Germany with long distances to Greifswald. Therefore, both diagnostics and therapy were carried out telemedically. Method(s): VITT patients were offered to send in a brief symptom inventory (BSI-18) and provide informed consent, if they wanted to be contacted by specialized psychologists. To assess amount and severity of their symptoms, standardized questionnaires were sent (Table 1). Additionally, contacts between patients were realized as group video calls. Result(s): Of 68 patients enrolled into the follow-up study, 20 sent back the first BSI-18 questionnaire and showed interest to be contacted by a psychologist;14 completed all questionnaires (females n = 10;median age 33.5y, range 23-74 years). After first telephone call, ten patients expressed interest in further psychological treatment (14.7%). Most of these patients were in good mental and physical state before vaccination. Patients showed a wide range in the level of the regained functioning. In the IES-R- 5, six patients described symptoms that signify the likely presence of a post-traumatic stress disorder, especially those with delayed diagnosis due to the novelty of VITT. Nine patients suffered from fatigue, six severely. VITT complications following vaccinations against COVID-19 were associated with great anxiety and sometimes trauma related physical symptoms. Conclusion(s): Clinicians should be aware that psychological disorders can appear after VITT. Patients benefit from psychological support to cope with impairments of daily life, increased fatigue and increased anxiety in regard to decision making for booster vaccinations.
ABSTRACT
[Formula presented] Introduction Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a severe complication of recombinant adenoviral vector vaccines used to prevent COVID-19, likely due to anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) IgG antibodies. The specificity and platelet-activating activity of VITT antibodies strikingly resemble that of antibodies detected in “autoimmune” heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), but their features remain poorly characterized. In particular, a better knowledge of these antibodies should help to understand the mechanisms leading to hypercoagulability and the particular thrombotic events observed in VITT, but rarely in typical HIT. We have recently developed a chimeric IgG1 anti-PF4 antibody, 1E12, which strongly mimics “autoimmune” HIT antibodies in terms of specificity and cellular effects. Therefore, we assessed whether 1E12 could mimic VITT antibodies. We then evaluated the capability of DG-1E12, a deglycosylated form of 1E12 unable to bind FcγR, to inhibit cellular activation induced by VITT antibodies. Methods and Results Using a PF4-sensitized serotonin release assay (PF4-SRA) (Vayne C, New Engl J Med, 2021), we demonstrated that 1E12 (5 and 10 μg/mL) strongly activated platelets, with a pattern similar to that obtained with human VITT samples (n=7), i.e. in a PF4-dependent manner and without heparin. This platelet activation was inhibited by low heparin concentration (0.5 IU/mL), an effect also observed with VITT samples. Serotonin release induced by 1E12 was also fully inhibited by IV-3, a monoclonal antibody blocking FcγRIIa, or by IdeS, a bacterial protease that cleaves IgG and strongly inhibits the binding of IgG antibodies to FcγRIIa. This inhibitory effect of IV-3 and IdeS strongly supports that interactions between pathogenic anti-PF4 IgG and FcγRIIa play a central role in VITT. Incubation of 1E12 or VITT samples with isolated neutrophils (PMN) and platelets with PF4 (10 µg/mL) strongly induced DNA release and NETosis, supporting that PMN are involved in the processes leading to thrombosis in VITT. Furthermore, when whole blood from healthy donors incubated with 1E12 or VITT plasma was perfused in capillaries coated with von Willebrand Factor, numerous large platelet/leukocyte aggregates containing fibrin(ogen) were formed. To investigate whether 1E12 and VITT antibodies recognize overlapping epitopes on PF4, we then performed competitive assays with a deglycosylated form of 1E12 (DG-1E12), still able to bind PF4 but not to interact with Fcγ receptors. In PF4-SRA, pre-incubation of DG-1E12 (50 µg/mL) dramatically reduced platelet activation induced by VITT antibodies, which was fully abrogated for 9 of the 14 VITT samples tested. Additional experiments using a whole blood PF4-enhanced flow cytometry assay recently designed for VITT diagnosis (Handtke et al, Blood 2021), confirmed that DG-1E12 fully prevented platelet activation induced by VITT antibodies. Moreover, when platelets and neutrophils were pre-incubated with DG-1E12 (100 µg/mL), NETosis and thus DNA release, nuclear rounding, and DNA decondensation induced by VITT antibodies were completely inhibited. Finally, DG-1E12 (100 µg/mL) also fully abolished VITT antibody-mediated thrombus formation in whole blood in vitro under vein flow conditions. Comparatively, DG-1E12 did not inhibit ALB6, a murine monoclonal anti-CD9 antibody, which also strongly activates platelets in a FcγRIIa-dependent manner. Conclusions Our results show that 1E12 exhibits features similar to those of human VITT antibodies in terms of specificity, affinity and cellular effects, and could therefore be used as a model antibody to study the pathophysiology of VITT. Our data also demonstrate that DG-1E12 prevents blood cell activation and thrombus formation induced by VITT antibodies, likely due to the competitive effect of its Fab fragment on antibody binding to PF4. DG-1E12 may allow the development of a new drug neutralizing the pathogenic effect of autoimmune anti-PF4 antibodies, such as those associated with VITT. Disclosures: T iele: Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Other;Pfizer: Honoraria, Other;Bayer: Honoraria;Chugai Pharma: Honoraria, Other;Novo Nordisk: Other;Novartis: Honoraria;Daichii Sankyo: Other. Pouplard: Stago: Research Funding. Greinacher: Macopharma: Honoraria;Biomarin/Prosensa: Other, Research Funding;Sagent: Other, Research Funding;Rovi: Other, Research Funding;Gore inc.: Other, Research Funding;Bayer Healthcare: Other, Research Funding;Paringenix: Other, Research Funding;BMS: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding;MSD: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding;Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding;Aspen: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding;Portola: Other;Ergomed: Other;Instrument Laboratory: Honoraria;Chromatec: Honoraria. Gruel: Stago: Other: symposium fees, Research Funding. Rollin: Stago: Research Funding.
ABSTRACT
Background: SARS-CoV-2 vaccine ChAdOx1 nCov-19 rarely causes vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) that-like autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia-is mediated by platelet-activating anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies. Aims: To understand how the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine ChAdOx1 nCov-19 can induce anti-PF4 antibodies and how these antibodies induce thrombosis Methods: We investigated vaccine, PF4, and VITT patient-derived anti-PF4 antibody interactions using 3D-super-resolution microscopy, dynamic light scattering, and transmission electron microscopy. Vaccine composition was analyzed by mass spectrometry. Experimental vascular leakage models assessed early post-vaccine reactions. We evaluated VITT antibody-mediated platelet activation and formation of procoagulant DNA-containing neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), including within VITT patient cerebral venous thrombi. Results: Biophysical analyses showed HEK cell line proteins and free virus proteins in the vaccine, formation of complexes between PF4 and vaccine constituents (including viral proteins) that were recognized by VITT antibodies. In a murine model, EDTA (vaccine constituent) increased microvascular leakage with dissemination of virus-and cell culture-derived human proteins. Free viral proteins and preexisting antibodies in normal human sera reacting with vaccine-containing constituents, likely contribute to commonly observed acute ChAdOx1 nCov-19 post-vaccination inflammatory reactions. PF4-binding polyanions (polyphosphates, DNA) enhanced PF4-dependent platelet activation by VITT antibodies. In the presence of platelets, PF4 enhanced VITT antibody-driven NETs formation;further evidence for NETosis included elevated NETs biomarkers and low DNase activity in VITT sera, and NETs/ neutrophil-rich cerebral vein thrombi extracted from VITT patients. Conclusions: ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine constituents form antigenic complexes with PF4, and EDTA increases microvascular permeability, enhancing risk of early post-vaccination acute inflammatory reactions;PF4/polyanion antigen formation in a proinflammatory milieu offers an explanation for anti-PF4 antibody production. Resulting high-titer anti-PF4 antibodies activate platelets and induce neutrophil activation with NETosis, further fueling the VITT prothrombotic response.